3The difference between (7a) and (7b) is the distinction between the first person, a morphologically marked distinction in several languages. This distinction is not relevant to our current purposes. Indeed, noun modifiers in languages such as German and Latin coincide with their subtantives in numbers, sex and cases; The three categories are mixed into declination paradigms. 6A related observation can be made for English. There are finite clauses that have a theme, but none that has phi-characteristics. For example, clauses that have a cap subject. In this context too, the finished verb carries an agreement of a third person (z.B. that Mary wants to settle in Ireland, surprise/∗s astonishing person). An agreement based on grammatical numbers can be made between verb and subject, as in the case of the grammatical person discussed above. In fact, the two categories are often mixed in conjugation patterns: there are specific forms of verbs for the first-person singular, the second plural, etc.
Some examples: in Norway, Nynorsk, Swedish, Icelandic and Fland, the current participation game must agree on gender, number and determination if the participant is in an attribute or predictive position. With regard to the Icelandic and the fist table, the current participants should also agree in the grammatical case. Slioussar, N., and Malko, A. (2016). Gender Agreement attraction in Russian: production and understanding of evidence. Up front. Psychol. 7:1651. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01651 Hartsuiker, R.
J., Antén-Méndez, I., and van Zee, M. (2001). Object attraction in verb-subject contract construction. I`m J. J. long. 45, 546-572. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2787 Accord or Concorde (abbreviated agr) occurs when a word changes form, according to the other words to which it refers.  This is a case of bending and usually involves making the value of a grammatical category (such as sex or person) “agree” between different words or parts of the sentence. Spoken French always distinguishes the plural from the second person and the plural from the first person in the formal language and from the rest of the contemporary form in all the verbs of the first conjugation (infinitive in -il) except Tout.
The plural first-person form and the pronoun (us) are now replaced by the pronoun (literally: “one”) and a third person of singular verb in modern French. So we work (formally) on Work. In most of the verbs of other conjugations, each person in the plural can be distinguished between them and singular forms, again, if one uses the traditional plural of the first person. The other endings that appear in written French (i.e. all singular endings and also the third plural person of the Other as the Infinitifs in-er) are often pronounced in the same way, except in the contexts of liaison. Irregular verbs such as being, fair, all and holdings have more pronounced contractual forms than normal verbs. Mancini, S., Molinaro, N., Rizzi, L. and Carreiras, M. (2011). A person is not a number: participation in the speech in the calculation of the subject-verb agreement. Brain Res. 1410, 64-76.
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.06.055 Bock, K., and Miller, C. (1991). Agreement broken. Mr. Cognit. Psychol. 23, 45-93. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(91)90003-7 Languages cannot have a conventional agreement, as in Japanese or Malay; barely one, as in English; a small amount, as in spoken French; a moderate amount, such as in Greek or Latin; or a large quantity, as in Swahili.
http://www.yourizoon.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/yz-logo-tekst4-transparent.png00hiddehttp://www.yourizoon.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/yz-logo-tekst4-transparent.pnghidde2021-04-08 05:10:402021-04-08 05:10:40Agreement In Person And Number